Week 3 First Impression – Development

What is the “best” way to parent? The answer varies depending on who you ask. I think one of the greatest way to raise a child is to lead by example. A child is born observing. We always see children trying to be like mommy or daddy by wearing their shoes or copying their behavior. Mommy and daddy are almost like superheroes when kids are younger and the kids want to be just like them. Children are learning how to behave from the way their parents behave. Parents can tell their kids to be kind to others, not to lie, not to curse, but if the kids see their parents doing all of these things, they will be more likely to follow their example rather than their empty words.

One of the best things a parent can do, especially as a child gets older, is to listen. Children are in need of a guardian and model. They need to know that they can place their trust in someone that truly cares for them. If a parent is always there to listen to their child and make them feel loved, the child will not go searching for this affection and sense of belonging elsewhere in a person or group that could harm or corrupt them.

I also think that encouragement is a huge part of parenting. If a parent only criticizes, the child will most likely become self -conscious and will have very little faith in their own abilities. If a parent encourages their child when they achieve something or encourages their child to achieve something, the child will be much more confident in their ability and potential. They can then become a much more developed, productive, and happy member of society.

I believe that being the person you want your child to be, listening to your child, and encouraging them to reach their potential is a great beginning to being the “best” parent you can be.


Week 2 First Impression – Research Methods

Myth busters has been a popular TV show for many years. During an episode titled “Laws of Attraction” the myth busters team designed an experiment to test the popular idea that men find blond women more attractive. While some aspects of the experiment did follow the proper scientific method, other aspects did not.

The first thing the myth busters did was identify a question of interest. This is a good first step and a great way to begin establishing the experiment. After this, the team selected a research method and chose their participants. They chose a group of females and three groups of males of approximately the same age and conducted their procedure. This was also another positive aspect of their experiment. The team selected a specific age group and gender to investigate which eliminated any unwanted variables. After conducting their procedure, the team compiled the data and analyzed the numbers to see if there were any significant differences. It turns out, there weren’t. The analysis of the data is an essential part of the scientific method that the team did complete.

However, there were a few aspects of their experiment that could have used some improvements. At the beginning, the myth busters had a question they wanted to answer; “do men find blonds more attractive?” However, they did not construct a testable hypothesis. They also did not review any scientific literature in order to construct this hypothesis. They could have investigated similar studies in order to guide their hypothesis and the structure of their procedure. This is an essential part of the scientific method that they did not complete. After completing their procedure, the team tabulated and analyzed their data but they did not make any theories as to why they discovered these results. They found that the three hair colors had received approximately the same ratings when averaged out and concluded that hair color was not a factor in “attractiveness” according to men. From these results they could have build a theory as to why the idea came about in the first place.

This study was very interesting and had many strengths but it could have included more elements of the scientific method to eliminate the weaker areas of the study.


About Me

Hello readers,

My name is Estefany and I am currently a sophomore in college. This semester I am taking General Psychology. Since I am a pre-med student, I am taking this to course to prepare for the MCAT. However, I am also genuinely interested in the subject. As a junior in high school, I took AP Psychology and found the class to be very interesting. I thought it was really great learning about concepts that applied to me and that I could actually see in my everyday life.

When I hear the word “psychology” I think about the mind and about discovering why people do certain things. However, I’m sure psychology involves much more than this. The three topics I am most excited to learn about are cognitive development, personality theory, and coping with stress. I would like to become a pediatrician and work with kids someday so I think it would be interesting to learn about their brain development since I will be learning mostly about their physical development later on. I would also like to learn  about personality theory and coping with stress because these are two topics that relate to me personally. The three topics I am least interested in learning about are the scientific method, research methods, and neurons. I think I am least interested in these topics because they are subjects we have discussed and learned about in my science courses. We have dealt with the scientific method and research methods a lot in chemistry and biology labs and I have also learned a lot about neurons in my biology and anatomy & physiology courses.

I hope to learn about many things in this course and I don’t think I could narrow it down to one single question. However, I would like to learn about the nature vs nurture discussion. I have always found this topic to be very interesting and I would like to see how this knowledge could be useful later in my career as a pediatrician.

I am looking forward to a great semester in PSY 101!