#Hoarders

The typical format of shows like My Strange Addiction, Hoarding: Buried Alive, and Intervention include the introduction of a mentally ill person with a problem. After a reveal of how dire their need for help is–because usually a relationship is on the line–a specialist is brought in to address the individual, and the audience is left to watch the drama unfold.

Who yells at who? Who breaks down first? Will they ultimately change? Will they not?

As a kid, my mom ate this stuff up. I’d occasionally watch them with her on humdrum Saturday mornings, lounging around with a grilled cheese and TLC’s tag lines playing in the background. I never really liked them, however. They made me feel funny on the inside and a little more than guilty for peeping in on something I thought should be private.

The assigned video made me remember why I wasn’t fond: everything, even the altruism displayed, felt either insulting or artificial.

For instance, the video follows the aforementioned format. A man struggles with his hoarding addiction. He has a girlfriend who’s naturally dissatisfied and is considering leaving him despite still feeling attached. A behavioral therapist and a professional organizer are brought in to help solve the “problem,” camera crew in tow. Little progress is made in six weeks when he halts the cleaning up process. To me, this enforces the negative stereotype of the mentally ill being stubbornly “unfixable” (as if it were their fault) even when the resources to “get better” are made plainly available. It’s not that simple. Emerging from a mental illness, especially one as long-held as this man’s compulsive hoarding, is a back and forth system full of advances and setbacks over years which a television show can’t possibly capture. Another thing television shows can’t possibly capture is the emotion behind the mental illness. Despite one or two vignettes where the individual recounts the trauma rooting a disorder or venting about how difficult life is in their shoes, only superficial attention is given to their torment. It doesn’t show the sleepless nights of pacing back and forth, listening to little voices in the back of your head, or anything past what’s necessary to evoke pathos in the audience. Such a simplification is frustrating, creating the same two dimensional figureheads of mental illness created by a poorly done horror film’s “psychopath.”

Second, the visual styling of the show made me queasy. Conducted in the same format as reality television about rich families, Hoarding: Buried Alive once more downplays the severity of these mental disorders. To no fault of the audience, we’re led to view these people as nothing more than intriguing cases for our pleasure, entertainment. The handheld camera zooming in, the intermittent interviews, the background music, and advertising all evoke memories of Keeping Up with the Kardashians  or–even worse–since it equates making over someone’s house to making over someone’s mind–Extreme Makeover: Home Edition. (Click the links for examples.) It’s grossly corporate for something which should be honestly portrayed as a call for awareness.

The most perturbing thing, however, was the advertising used in the video. For instance, blurbs would pop up over its course–Twitter posts made by someone I assume is part of the production team. They end with “#Hoarders.” While this is a reference to the show’s name, the concept of someone using a word associated with legitimately mentally ill people in the same way as “#fashion” or “#like4like” horrifies me on a personal level. Can you imagine a depressed person flicking through the internet for relatable content and instead coming across a post advertising a show on TLC with the hashtag “#depressed”?  Additionally, the My Strange Addiction webpage baits audiences with the headline “You Won’t Believe How Strange These Addictions Are.” While I admit it’s a part of our inherit psychology to be fascinated by The Weird, it doesn’t mean we should go ahead and exploit living, breathing people with such a sterile glove.

Basically, I’m saying is if you want to see something strange, go ahead and take a tour of Ripley’s because–believe it or not–mental illness isn’t entertainment.

 

Sources:

Inside Hoarding: Cleaning Up For Love | Hoarding: Buried Alive [Video file]. (2014, March 6). Retrieved May 7, 2016, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQqldk_Bg3o
KUWTK | Rob Re-Gifts Kendall’s Present to Blac Chyna | E! [Video file]. (2016, April 26). Retrieved May 7, 2016, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrzkqa2N-Ig
Log Beams for Dining Room Remodel on Extreme Makeover [Video file]. (2011, March 12). Retrieved May 7, 2016, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pIY3WBdBXwU

Schizophrenia Simulation

Schizophrenia is a mental illness causing a set of negative, positive, and cognitive symptoms; however, the hallmark characteristics the disorder calls to mind are the positive symptoms, hallucinations and delusions. Hallucinations involve the introduction of non-real elements into a person’s perception of reality. These can occur in all the different senses. Some, for instance, will smell strange odors or feel bugs crawling on their skin–though the most common hallucinations are auditory and visual. Delusions, on the other hand, are false beliefs a person is convinced are certainly true. With schizophrenia, these are typically preposterous and paranoid. Many schizophrenics believe the government is out to persecute them.

Since these symptoms appear in media, we often have preconceived ideas about what constitutes a schizophrenics mind. Graduate student Alexandra Logan refers to thriller movies such as Black Swan, Shutter Island, and Friday the 13th, saying these movies support negative stereotypes like “people with mental illness are violent, unpredictable, untreatable and… evil.” While I can’t say I personally have this point of view, I can say I love thriller movies and sadly have rarely considered this harmful perspective.

Through watching a video  attempting to accurately portray the positive symptoms of schizophrenia, I sought to gain a new understanding of how a schizophrenic individual might see the world during a psychotic episode. The scene opens with a regular, domestic day bathed in tranquility. Then, steadily, voices begin to creep into the audio. They call me worthless and lazy, taunting and telling me I’d be better off dead or how to never trust anyone, even the pizza delivery boy at the door. Food is poison. Medication is poison. The weather is out to get me. After a while, an eerie sensation begins to sneak up o me, and I realize how difficult it would be to disobey these voices because of how sure, how commanding they are. As we learned in previous units, humans are hardwired to go along with an authority figure’s commands even if we believe them to be morally reprehensible as demonstrated by the Milgram experiment in which an incredibly high percentage of adults “electrocuted” a (thankfully nonexistent) opponent on the command of a researcher. This video reminds me not only would I be pressured into doing the same, but how frustrating a life lived like this would be. If you ignored the voices, you’d get in trouble as perceived by your reality. If you listened to them, you’d consider yourself a monster.

How overwhelming. I understand the high suicide rates associated with schizophrenia on a first hand basis now.

Additionally, the video caused me to consider how difficult social situations would be when your sense of reality is so shaky. Never knowing when a person’s actions are a hallucination or due to a delusion would make it almost impossible to trust anyone. I was also alarmed by the lack of safe space to retreat to. During a psychotic episode, nowhere is safe, not even when you close your eyes.

Sources:

Delusions. (n.d.). Retrieved May 7, 2016, from http://www.minddisorders.com/Br-Del/Delusions.html
Logan, A. (2014, December 11). Schizophrenia in the Media Vs. Real Life. Retrieved May 7, 2016, from http://www.skepticink.com/gps/2014/12/11/schizophrenia-in-the-media-vs-real-life/
Types of Schizophrenia – A day in the life of (Scary) Luke Murphy [Video file]. (2011, July 21). Retrieved May 7, 2016, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LWYwckFrksg

Schizophrenia in the Media

I chose to do the first option and watched the video simulating what it’s like to be a person with schizophrenia.  Watching that video was a very surreal experience for me. I don’t know how I would be able to deal with those complications in my everyday life.  From the negative voices in my head telling me that I’m worthless and that they hate me to the paranoia with normal things such as the pizza guy or my coffee, I honestly don’t think I would be able to function whatsoever. There are a number of movies that are centered around characters with schizophrenia and they are portrayed usually as tragically sad with some characters being redeemed in the end by their “gift”. Many movies and TV shows portray schizophrenia in a comedic way though. These characters usually deal with voices in their heads too but instead of being hateful like the ones in the video, they tend to cause the character to do something hilarious and crazy. Or other times they are seen walking around and talking to themselves or inanimate objects causing comedic  discomfort to the other characters of the show. These portrayals, in my opinion, take a lot of the seriousness of schizophrenia away. I know that until I took this class, I had never really given much thought to what it would be like to be schizophrenic. After reading more about it in the book and watching this video, I have a much clearer understanding of schizophrenia and the effects it has on people’s lives. I think the media really needs to work on how they depict people with schizophrenia. By downplaying the symptoms and making them seem humorous and harmless, many people never even realize the gravity of what people with schizophrenia go through every day.


Reality vs Media

Schizophrenia defined by our psychology textbook is “a mental disorder characterized by disorganized thoughts, lack of contact with reality, and sometimes auditory hallucinations.” ( Comer and Gould G-11). The video that I was to watch for this prompt, explained to me that this is how a day in life would be of a person with schizophrenia. The video also warned me that if I felt uncomfortable to stop the video since it some of the material shown could be traumatizing. From here I started the video…

In this simulator representation of schizophrenia, it the beginning it looked as if the person was living in the home by themselves and they were having a fairly good day. The second that the schizophrenic part started, the video got darker and the voices in the persons head got very negative. I was surprised that the voices in the persons head were all negative, there was not a single good thing that any of those voices said and I feel that the voices are a big part in why this person was not able to do a lot of his daily activities that could have possibly made him feel better. Some of the things that I noticed was the person wanted to take his medication but the voices said not to, he wanted to drink some of the coffee but his disease made him think that the coffee was bubbling and was poison, he wanted to eat pizza but the voices made the pizza bubble and the voices also made him think that the pizza was poison.

Schizophrenia in the media is portrayed as this really crazy disease where people are not able to lead a normal life where they can not do daily activities and their every moment is affected. Generally in the media, the person acts in a crazy manner and is usually taken care by someone because they cannot take care of themselves. Yes, this is true that some cases of schizophrenia are more severe than others but there are many people out there that lead very normal lives even when they have this disease. In reality, the voices that the simulator showed are very true and do happen in real life but I’m sure that that they are not so many all at the same time. I also watched other videos on youtube of people with schizophrenia, I noticed that they go through phases why they hallucinate. For example, there was a boy who for sometime saw animals, then for sometime didn’t see anything, then went back to seeing animals and large numbers and letters.

I think that all in all, schizophrenia is a very tough disorder and it definitely affects the person with the disease and the the people around them. The media does over dramatize the daily life of a person having schizophrenia versus how they are in real life.

Work Cited:

Comer, R. J., & Gould, E. (2013). Psychology around us (Second ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

 


Making a Murderer: Evolution at Its Finest?

Some months ago, a blog prompt caught my interest. Jim Fallon’s TED Talk considers a little contemplated notion: what if there were a gene connecting serial killers to their crimes? As it turns out, there just might be.

The MAOA gene is responsible for producing monoamine oxidase A, an enzyme which degrades neurotransmitters in the brain such as norepinephrine, epinephrine, and dopamine. These are crucial to regulating our moods and their subsequent actions. MAOA genes come in five “flavors,” or differing levels of activity; however, for my purpose, it’ll be simplified into either “high” or “low” rates of enzymatic activity, denoted by the suffix “-H” and “-L.”

A handful of research studies have shown a correlation between the presence of MAOA-L and rash, aggressive behavior–probably due to lower concentrations of MAOA resulting in a surplus of the aforementioned neurotransmitters since there’s less enzyme to decay them.

For example, a study conducted by Brown University linked MAOA-L to higher rates of aggressive behavior in response to an irritating stimulus. The study involved 78 college age males who completed a task, received payment, and had a certain amount of money subtracted from their account by an unseen opponent. The participants could then choose to punish their opponent by making them eat hot sauce. Students possessing MAOA-L were more likely to exact their revenge than those coded for MAOA-H, especially when large amounts of money were taken. Researchers posit this demonstrates a linkage between our genetic and evolutionary history, citing “altruistic punishment”–the evolutionary psychology theory stating some of us evolved to punish deviant members of our social groups for the benefit of the larger sum.

Evolution appears once more in a study summarizing the occurrence of MAOA-L genes in different ethnic populations. Interestingly, MAOA-L appears to be more common in populations with a history of warfare. For instance, 56% of Maori men possess the gene. The Maori are a people who in the past fought amongst one another in competition for the Polynesian islands’ limited natural resources. Consequentially, it makes sense a high percentage of successful lineages would bear the genes which made their ancestors victorious in war. Due to this, the MAOA gene is often dubbed the “warrior gene.” Still, it’s important to regard the other numbers recounted. The MAOA-L gene is common to 34% of European men, 56% of Chinese men, 58% of African American men, and 61% of Taiwanese men.

I’d be interested in knowing the percentages of African men to determine whether or not the frequency in African Americans is because of pressures in the U.S., if the trait is older, or if it’s a combination of the two. Additionally, I’d love to research the history of these ethnicities to determine whether high percentages coincide with historical events or not since another source claims the gene to be prevalent in 1/3 of the “Western world” and 2/3 in less developed regions. Although genotypic changes probably take multiple generations to stabilize, I doubt it’s a linear trend.

Now, does all of this mean the mere possession of the MAOA gene outright determines a person will become a murdering machine? Well, for one, despite the gene being relatively common in the population 30-50% of us don’t commit violent crime. This brings us back to Jim Fallon’s TED Talk and his claim of environment having a great influence on the individual a la epigenetics. Alondra Oubre’s article agrees, saying child abuse during the ages of 1-5 years of age especially increase the risk of a MAOA-L gene carrier developing antisocial characteristics which could lead to violent crime. Moreover, a Finnish study recounted by Dr. Emily Deans for Psychology Today brings up it may not be the MAOA-L gene alone causing individuals to be violent. Instead, it’s proposed a combination of high risk genes plus environmental influences  lead to violence. The study examined prison inmates who had committed over ten “seriously violent crimes,” finding a 13.45 odds ratio between low activity MAOA genes and the CDH13 gene, a gene responsible for producing an adhesive protein in the brain. It’s also linked to alcoholism, strengthening the connection between alcoholism and violent behavior.

I’d be curious to know whether or not these factors were more common back when the warrior gene presented a definite advantage to our survival and if practically everyone with dormant violent tendencies would demonstrate them.

All in all, I found this an incredibly cool topic to research. It reawakened my love for our evolutionary history as a species from a biological, anthropological, and psychological perspective and the interaction between all these aspects is something I’d love to explore more.

 

Sources:

Baum, D. (2009, January 19). Punishment by Hot Sauce “Warrior Gene” Predicts Aggressive Behavior After Provocation. Retrieved May 5, 2016, from https://news.brown.edu/articles/2009/01/hotsauce

Deans, E., Dr. (2014, October 30). A Gene for Violence? Retrieved May 5, 2016, from https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/evolutionary-psychiatry/201410/gene-violence 

Jim Fallon: Exploring the mind of a killer [Video file]. (2009, February). Retrieved May 5, 2016, from http://www.ted.com/talks/jim_fallon_exploring_the_mind_of_a_killer

Oubre, A. (2014, July 31). The Extreme Warrior gene: A reality check. Retrieved May 5, 2016, from https://scientiasalon.wordpress.com/2014/07/31/the-extreme-warrior-gene-a-reality-check/

 


schiz·o·phre·ni·a

Schizophrenia is a long-term mental disorder that can cause a breakdown in the relation between thought, emotion, and behavior, leading to faulty perception, inappropriate actions and feelings, withdrawal from reality and personal relationships into fantasy and delusion, and a sense of mental fragmentation. It is generally a mentality that is characterized by inconsistent and contradictory elements.

The simulation that I was required to watch really opened my eyes about schizophrenia. The video warned me about visual and auditory effects that were designed to demonstrate the multiple hallucinations and delusions that someone with the mental health issue experiences on a daily basis. It used a first person shot, so that the viewer could experience the video from the perspective of the patient. This helped the voice-overs to represent the “voices in his head” and the illusions portrayed to seem more realistic.

The video reminded me of a horror video game, which are programmed with certain features that are meant to thrill the player. The first person view was similar to video game design as well as the voices talking to me and telling me what to do. It was even more intense when the voices would contradict themselves and what the character was doing. Another effect commonly used in games is bizarre altercations like the bubbling pizza and the altered letters on the box that read “Poizzon”. My favorite part which really freaked me out the most, was when the weather man started talking through the tv to the main character, telling him that the weather was out to get him and mocking that he wasn’t going to do anything about it. The multiple voices arguing at once was very distracting and made it difficult for the character to perform actions that he wanted.

In the media schizophrenia is commonly seen as so out-of-control that the patient needs constant attention and a safe location such as a mental hospital. The hallucinations are thought to be so extreme that the person is unable to live in reality at all, when actually the person is situated in reality with a few additions that make it difficult to perform actions without fear.

The media has used movies like A Beautiful Mind, The Soloist, and Donnie Darko to portray schizophrenia in film. This has the effect of over-exaggerating and adding things that are “sexy for the screen”, and don’t accurately portray the realities of living in the mind of a schizophrenic. I have not seen any of these movies, nor any other movie (as I am aware) that demonstrates the mental disorder. This may or may not have effected my reaction to the video watched. I have never really learned in much detail about the mental disorder, schizophrenia, I just always knew it was a struggle for those who suffer from it.

 


Week 14 Blog Prompts: Mental Health

Hand writing on a notebook

Here are the three prompts for this week. Regardless of which prompt you choose, use the tag “Mental Health.”

Option 1

Schizophrenia is often depicted dramatically in the media, and has been the subject of many major films like A Beautiful Mind, The Soloist, and Donnie Darko. Less frequently, however, do people get the chance to think about the daily life of someone who experiences hallucinations and delusions. Watch this video which simulates the experience of a person with schizophrenia, share your reactions, and compare this to how you typically see schizophrenia in the media.

Option 2

People often associate schizophrenia with the homeless population or mental hospitals, but rarely do we think about people who are professionally very successful. One person who is thriving despite her schizophrenia is Elyn Saks, who received her law degree from Yale and is a professor at the University of Southern California. In her TED Talk, she describes how she struggled with her disorder and was eventually able to manage her condition and take control of her life. Share your reactions to the video, discuss how her story compares to the “typical narrative” of schizophrenia, and discuss why you think she turned out differently than other people with this disorder.

Option 3

Television shows like My Strange Addiction, Intervention, True Life, and others have turned some mental illnesses into entertainment. In particular, the shows Hoarders and Hoarding: Buried Alive showcase people with hoarding disorder trying to get their lives, homes, and relationships back in order. What do you think about this type of show? Is it ethical to do? Does it exploit people with mental illnesses? Answer these questions, then watch this clip from Hoarding: Buried Alive and share your reactions and if any of your perspectives changed. Then read the comments and again share your reactions and perspectives.

I look forward to seeing what you write!

Header image: CC by Flickr user Caitlinator

 

Share Via: FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail

IAT Test

The two IAT Test’s that I took we on age and weight. The age IAT Test was supposed to determine if I chose young people over old people, while the weight test was for me to see if I chose thin people over fat people. I want to say that I was surprised on what my results were, and I expected something different from what appeared. For one, I thought I didn’t really care for my preference over both age or weight, however my results showed otherwise. I want to doubt the results, because I did not like the way we had to be tested. For example, I did not see the point in having to correctly choose which person is fat and which person is thin for 10 minutes, because I do not understand how that would help determine if I prefer thin over fat people if I am just simply matching the pictures. I think instead of the simulation, it should have been more questions. I don’t think this test would necessarily be beneficial for college students, unless you just want to know the results just out of curiosity. I do, however, think this test would be great for people who are trying to get a job. For example, people who are unsure about what kind of field they want to work in, what kind of environment they would work well in, or who they would work better with, are all questions that can be answered by taking one of the IAT Tests. Maybe these kinds of tests should even be required to take in order to start applying for jobs. Overall, I thought taking these tests were interesting due to the results you get, but at the same time the way these tests were set up made me doubt my results.


IAT

I decided to take the Implicit Association Tests. The first test I took was the test determining how good or bad I am. It does not determine if you are racist, sexual, or homophobic but Implicit Association tests are useful to help understand more of yourself and others. Initially I consider myself as more of a ‘good’ person than bad. The test first asked me questions focusing on my social status and economical issues as well. After a bunch of questions I then had to identify pronouns about myself and either tie them into the categories of good or bad words. This was supposed to be done as quickly as possible which was challenging and I think it was supposed to test how you identify yourself impulsively on a good or bad spectrum. My results ranked me as more of a good person as opposed to bad. The questions asked seemed more of a better way to identify biases which may be outside your conscious awareness. I could also see how the speed test would determine thoughts or opinions outside of your control of conscious thoughts. The second test I completed was the anxiety brief implicit association test. The test took me through  the same activity from the first test where you would have to input a certain letter on the keyboard if the words Me myself I correlated to the category of being anxious or calm. Then next part took me though a series of the exact same questions asking about race, religion, economical opinions, social opinions, country of residence, and then finished with my results. I do identify as a very calm person, and the test accurately reflected my results. I am not a very anxious person unless put in the presence of something that makes me uncomfortable or anxious, obviously. I am not really sure how these evaluations work  or how they are put together but in both I found them to reflect me in a more accurate way then on the opposing side. For example, I identified as more good than bad, and more calm than anxious. This test can be useful for people who are trying to have a better understanding of who they are and how they can receive help or honestly anything. Employers would also appreciate these to understand the person they are about to employ into their business as well.


Psychology in the Media

My Rewrite

A recent research study revealed despite smoking’s popularity drastically decreasing over the last half decade, the proportion of nicotine addicts exhibiting “externalized” psychologic disorders has done the opposite.

Over 25 000 individuals participated in the study, selected from the National Epidemiological Survey for Alcohol and Related conditions (NESARC) on the terms they had neither been institutionalized or served in the military. From there, researchers divided the individuals into five “birth cohorts”–survey year subtracted from subject’s age–further subdividing them into three different smoking categories: non-smokers, never-dependent smokers, and ever-dependent smokers. (Ever-depedent smokers refer to individuals suffering from nicotine addiction in accordance with the DSM-IV’s criteria.)  Additionally, six mental illnesses were included in the survey. The screenings, performed by the AUSADUS-IV, included major depressive, alcohol-use, drug-use, attention-deficit/hyperactivity, bipolar, and antisocial personality disorder.

Analysis of the data revealed ever-dependent smokers from more recently born birth cohorts had higher rates of all mental illnesses except depression. For instance, ADHD saw a 0.75% increase per decade while bipolar and antisocial personality disorders grew 1.5%, and drug/alcohol-use disorders coincided. Depression rates were not affected.

What could it be?

For one, nicotine is a stimulant. It increases cognitive function and temporarily reduces anxiety. These affects are appealing to those suffering from an otherwise untreated mental disorder, and a fixation with cigarettes offers a form of self-medication. Researchers hypothesize that as society’s attitudes towards smoking began to wean out casual smokers in the 1960’s, those self-medicating individuals overtook the majority. This is supported by the fact that never-dependent smokers showed the same rate of mental illness as non-smokers.

Nevertheless, researchers made it clear the conundrum is extremely multifaceted with a host of other contributing factors. Additionally, it’s possible older smokers may not be accurately reporting their past smoking habits, or that older mentally ill smokers passed away before the surveys were taken. Both of these would result in an underreporting of mental illness rates for earlier birth cohorts, effectively skewing the data.

Despite this, researchers possess confidence in their explanation, proposing smoking should be considered an early indicator of undiagnosed mental illnesses.

 

 

Journalism Reflection

This was honestly one of the hardest blogs for me to write because of the word limit–a meager 341 words. I’m naturally a very verbose person at fault for literary styling which doesn’t always mesh well with scientific reporting. In addition, I’m also a very thorough writer. It pained me to have to leave out what I’d consider essential information such as how the other limitations and clarifications confirming while oversampling did occur in the original data collection, it was adjusted for in the analysis. I also chose to leave out the genetic component to the article because it didn’t flow well in what little space I had. Instead, like the news article, it caused my writing to become more confusing than informative. Pity, since I found it a really interesting part and quite telling of the sensationalist way media handles findings. (The news article made it seem a much larger contribution than it statistically is.) Another interesting realization of mine is how difficult an unbiased conclusion is to write. I felt as though I was compelled to include some moral Aesop at the end about the evils of smoking when doing so would’ve resulted in an unnecessary social slant.

Regardless, the exercise told a lot about how difficult this truly is. I have more sympathy for the journalists now.

 

 

Sources:

Pop Culture Article:

http://health.usnews.com/health-news/articles/2016-01-28/mental-disorders-increasing-for-younger-smokers

Research Article:

http://www.nature.com/mp/journal/v21/n4/full/mp2015224a.html